How to steal Property in SA, legal by High Courts

Herein I will show my case nr SCA Case 1205/2024) (Case no: 15466/2019) where the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed all my evidence.

(Respect Hello Peter)

If you want to steal from someone property legally via the High Courts,

1. 1. Open a motion case, where you demand big shares are yours in the property.

1. 1. Open a case where you demand payments from the legal property owner to pay you income, Forget about oral deals or any other documents U have signed, and the income part, the court will ignore it.

1. 1. The legal owner will pay on the respected oral deal u have made, it was not transferable but that does not matter.

1. 1. You then take the payments you demanded and tell your lawyer the story that your share is according to your payment.

1. 1. The SA High Courts will then say we can’t allow this motion, but if u can bring me proof, I will consider it.

1. 1. Don’t worry about what’s on the Deed the Deeds Office gave you 20 years ago or the deed that was handed in, approved by the municipality, or the approval the bank bond was approved 20 years ago.

1. 1. You know that the legal owner don’t have the money to fight in court.

1. 1. The legal owner can go to the police, magistrates will dismiss his cases, he can try fraud cases, criminal cases nowhere he will be helped, only lawyers will help him and the cost is very high, he must accept the fraud, even if it was perjury, the legal owner are not allowed to fight.

1. 1. You will walk away with millions in your pocket when you sell the property.

1. 1. The Supreme Court in SA will just dismiss all evidence the legal owner tries to hand in.

1. 1. Contact me I have all the evidence.

I, the undersigned,

Hendrik Jacobus Vermeulen,

Do hereby make an oath and say that:

I am an adult male person, currently residing at 150 Buitekant Street, Protea Hights, Brackenfell, Western Cape.   My ID number is: ……………………… and I can be contacted on. The facts and circumstances herein contained fall within the ambit of my personal knowledge and are the truth.

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE (OCJ) COMPLAINTS FORM

1. 1. Name and contact details of the complainant

Hendrik Jacobus Vermeulen  082 869 9013

• • Nature of the complaint

To open perjury case on the case (SCA Case 1205/2024)  (Case no: 15466/2019 high court Cape Town)

• • If the complaint is about court officials, the name of the court and court official/s if known

Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein, High Court Cape Town, NPA , SAPD (as Police) .

• • If the complaint relates to a case pending in a court, please provide the case number

Supreme Court of Appeal Case no 1205/2024, Case no: 15466/2019

• • Background and history of the complaint

1. 1. Vermeulen and partner are 2 married couples who bought a property in Durbanville in 2005. I had 1/3 shares in the property, I’m “married “out of community”, my wife had 1/3 shares, “married “out of community” and Mr and Mrs partner that is “married within community” also had a 1/3, as Reregistered on government deed, at the SA deeds office.CH1 was also seen on CH4 ,CH13 of 2005, checked by ABSA CH12.

• • Each person as above married with their constitutional rights by law.

• • High Court Cape Town Judge decision/order to take away my 1/3 share in our property, was security, so none of the 3 shareholders can sell to another person more than 1/3.

1. 1. The High Court Cape Town judge order via email was that I have now ¼ share, my wife 1/4 share, Mr partner ¼  share, and Mr partner ¼ share in the property, meaning they can now sell 50% share to another person. (unfair)

• • Mr and Mrs partners sold 50% of the property to the Buyer, while they only had 1/3 share to sell as on the Deed.

• • The buyer committed enormous fraud while he was a tenant under contract, renting out our property in his name as an owner. (as proof case nr 3766/2019). Bellville magistrate did not want to accept any fraud cases.

• • My lawyer applied to CSA (Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein) a petition to hand in new evidence,

SCA (Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa) order ref: 1205/2024

Order 1: Thanks very much for the application for leave granted

Order 2: New evidence Dismissed

1. 1. I opened a fraud case against Partners 485/03/2023, I emailed NPA (CHIEF PROSECUTORS AND SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS) Bellville (pochauke@justice.gov.za ) but until today no one has come back to me to get the case opened against the partners.

• • Now I want the case to be changed to a Perjury case, (Case 485/03/2023 where I report LIES in a high court Cape Town case 15466/2019 affidavits).

• • Partners, Lawyers, and advocate lied and told untrue stories in High Court court.

• •  I include the next serious evidence that the CSA has dismissed on my petition.

1. 1. Please see the Transfer Attorney letter CH 3 attached.

1. 1. Partners / Municipality authorizing as 1/3 shareholder, agreeing with the Deed in 2006 CH 4 attached.

1. 1. Partners/ Municipality authorizing as 1/3 shareholder (married within community), agreeing again with the official 2005 Deed in 2025,  CH 5 attached.

1. 1. In replying letter from the “Legal Practice Council” your CH 9 attached

• • “you were aggrieved by the fact that a portion of the property was sold to the buyer, with whom you have been embroiled in various litigious matters”

• • Yes, because the buyer as a tenant on the contract did not want the leave the premises (he was renting an office section for business)

• • The buyer made illegal contracts with tenants on my property. Fraud

• • While the buyer was renting, illegal building work was done in my store, without the owner’s approval or any munispality plans.

• • While the buyer was illegally acting as owner, because the partners sold their 1/3% share as 50% illegally to him, he was using my money to pay his debts. And the illegal contract. Fraud (Magistrate at Bellville court did not want to accept fraud cases via the police and Durbanville police inspecters)

• • Not true, I saw the contract a few months after the agreement was made, but I never knew about it, and the first I saw the contract, there were parts scratched out and I told my wife it was not a legal contract.

• • The buyer handed an untrue affidavit with the Cape Town High court case, signed 13 June 2020, CH 11, he never contacted me, and I refused to speak to him on phones/cells.

• • “the Deed of Sale expressly provides for only one-third share to be sold to the buyer, which nullifies your contention that said portion was sold without your knowledge and consent”

• • Previous Lawyer confirms the above to “Wardiya Esack” (CHIEF PROSECUTORS AND SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS)

• • Why in High Court Cape Town did their Lawyer / Advocate change all to 50% shares? Was an untrue story to the Cape Town High Court Judge, it was perjury.

• • Like their Lawyer said to “Legal Practice Council”, CH 10 (4),  I and my wife was in the Cape Town High Court when he changed the story told, the lawyer’s conversion of 1/3 share to 50% share, a pure made up untrue story by their Lawyer and his advocate, I see it as perjury.

• • The Applicants are joint owners of a 1/3 share as registered Deed, because of their married status, as the transferring lawyer registered it and the previous Lawyer admitted to “Legal Practice Council”.

• • Why did the Lawyer and his advocate suddenly change the story of the previous Lawyer 1/3 share to an untrue 50% share story, because of the illegal contact with the buyer? Or because they could fool the judge with an untrue story? About our payment, Kuilsriver Court forced us to pay, while the partner said they are not owners any more CH14, its perjury.

• • In his letter,  the Lawyer told “Legal Practice Council”,

• • CH 10 (9, 10), it was all perjury.

• • CH 10 (11), I and my wife could not believe the untrue story their Lawyer and his Advocate told the Cape Town High Court Jury… it’s perjury they made it up. All are also against the previous Lawyer replying letter to the “Legal Practice Council”.

• • CH 10 (12), I could not believe all this Perjury, Fraud, and Harassment are overseen by the highest courts in Cape Town and Bloemfontein. The trust we as citizens put in judges and courts and then they do not check all facts, take away a citizen’s constitutional rights and they don’t trust or respect deeds offices in South Africa.

• • How can a contract be made and signed without the official deed from SA Deeds Office in hand? Showing shares and ownership. CH 10 is attached. Then the Deed Offices supplied us with illegal documents in 2005, that was handed over by my Transfer lawyer, to ABSA Bond and Municipality, a deed signed and authorized by all partners in 2006 and again in 2025.

• • Kuilsriver Court case HC 6, 2021, we paid 50% rental income after expenses, on a legal oral deal we made before we signed the transfer en bond registration, 1/3, 1/3 1/3 shares, because the court pressured us to pay to the partners because they still owners on the deed. (but partners sent me evidence that they sold in 2010.

• • This was the sole argument point the lawyer and advocate had in Cape Town High Court, with no other concrete evidence, they only focused on a legal oral deal that we respected and were forced by the Kuilsriver court to pay out on and it was all a misleading story, it pure perjury on the evidence I have on hand and attached to this mail.

• • Kuilsriver Court case, was not legally right, because the partners said CH 7 they sold their 50% share already in 2010 (on an illegal contract), giving the buyer all rights to do what he wants with my money.

• • The Buyer was demanding on property that is the owner, while not fully paying his rent and collecting rent from other tenants on illegal contracts, using my money to pay his debt. on the Illegal contact between him and the Tillers. CH 2 court case transcription tells it all.

• •     If the Cape Town High Court accused the SA Deeds Office they made a mistake:

• •   Then all costs on these trails must be paid by the SA Deeds Office because they undermined the transfer lawyer’s demands.

• •  The SA deeds office pledged fraud to ABSA bank giving the bond on a DEED that is according to the Cape Town High court, and Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein not valid and undermined the transfer lawyer’s demands.

• • While I my constitutional rights are taken away, to buy property on our own status “married out of community”.

(Respect; Hello Peter)

Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein and Cape Town High Court cases against me or my wife, all produced untrue stories, perjury, 15 years of Fraud, and harassment.

I ask that all involved in this perjury must immediately be arrested and brought to trial before they harm more citizens and perjury in Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein , Cape Town High Court, Magistrates courts. and all other courts

I hope someone will look into these misleading trails we had and go through all the evidence supplied herewith.

I plea for assistance via emails to the NPA Bellville (pochauke@justice.gov.za),  NPA OF South Africa(CHIEF PROSECUTORS AND SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS), (communication@npa.gov.za) (npa@behonest.co.za), please assist me if I plea at the wrong departments.

God Bless

 As send to:

1: Office of the Chief Justice

 188, 14th Road, Noordwyk, Midrand, 1685

 Private Bag X10, Marshalltown, 2107 

 +27 10 493 2500 (Switchboard)

 enquiries@judiciary.org.za

2: Constitutional Court of South Africa

 Constitution Hill, 1 Hospital Street, Braamfontein, 2017 

 Private Bag X 1, Constitution Hill, Braamfontein, 2017 

 +27 11 359-7400 (Switchboard)

 info@concourt.org.za

The completed Complaints form must be submitted to a Complaints Officer responsible for the implicated court or to the National Complaints Officer if it relates to services rendered at the National Office of the OCJ.

Contact details of the National Complaints Officer as well as Complaints Officers responsible for the courts may be accessed via the following link: https://www.judiciary.org.za/index.php/complaints/ocj-complaints

 (Respect, Hello Peter)

I know and understand the contents of the above affidavit.

I have no objection to taking the prescribed oath.

I consider the prescribed oath to be binding on my conscience.

HENDRIK JACOBUS VERMEULEN

COMMISSIONER OF OATHS

FULL NAMES:

STREET ADDRESS:

EX OFFICIO:

AREA: